i got a little sassy at this year's canadian association of physicists conference
and bet that the LHC wouldn't find the higgs boson in the next couple years.
It's my stupid "professional opinion" that the higgs mechanism is a little oversimple...
gravity is all "I'm nonlinear", and particle physics is all "LINEARITY IS MOST IMPORTANT"
and then the higgs mechanism is all "looks like a mass parameter is generated in a linear expansion"
and then it's all "wooo! we've discovered mass"
and i'm like "shenanigans! first you gotta tell me how energy works, because renormalization is a hack job that only works because of magic. once you do that, you can tell me about gravity and discovering mass."
and then i stick out my tongue and flip them off.
anyway.
i hope they don't discover the higgs boson.
and imade a bet with a particle cosmologist that they wouldn't.
in any case, they've got circulating beams
http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressRel eases/Releases2009/PR17.09E.html
it's only a matter of time now before EVERYONE (or me) IS WRONG!
and bet that the LHC wouldn't find the higgs boson in the next couple years.
It's my stupid "professional opinion" that the higgs mechanism is a little oversimple...
gravity is all "I'm nonlinear", and particle physics is all "LINEARITY IS MOST IMPORTANT"
and then the higgs mechanism is all "looks like a mass parameter is generated in a linear expansion"
and then it's all "wooo! we've discovered mass"
and i'm like "shenanigans! first you gotta tell me how energy works, because renormalization is a hack job that only works because of magic. once you do that, you can tell me about gravity and discovering mass."
and then i stick out my tongue and flip them off.
anyway.
i hope they don't discover the higgs boson.
and imade a bet with a particle cosmologist that they wouldn't.
in any case, they've got circulating beams
http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressRel
it's only a matter of time now before EVERYONE (or me) IS WRONG!
1 comment | Leave a comment

